arvino’s posterous

business 'un-usual', innovation, breakthrough ideas, management, life, experience, wisdom & entrepreneurial spirit around the globe 
Filed under

microsoft

 

Microsoft’s Real Problem: Facebook is the New Outlook

Microsoft’s Real Problem: Facebook is the New Outlook, and Other ways that Redmond is not Listening to Generation Y
 
by Dan Kimerling on September 13, 2008
 
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/13/microsofts-real-problem-facebook-is-the-new-outlook-and-other-ways-that-remond-is-not-listening-to-generation-y/
 
Microsoft, for all its problems, is a great software company. Its core products, the Windows operating system and the Office productivity suite, still dominate their respective markets and, while they are continually facing more capable competition and hence have declining market share, Windows and Office remain strong product offerings.
 
Yet, it is clear that something is rotten in the State of Redmond. A reading of Microsoft’s Annual Report only strengthens this conviction. For those that do not want to read the entire thing Brier Dudley’s blog offers an excellent summation (http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/brierdudley/2008/07/microsoft_discloses_google_app.html), focusing on the issues that keep Ballmer up at night.
 
However, it does not seem to be the competitive landscape which has changed the consumer orientation towards Microsoft. What has really thrown Microsoft off, is that other companies have shown those consumers both most willing to try new technologies and most willing to open their wallets for technology, the consumers of Generation-Y, that they do not need Microsoft. Companies like Facebook, Apple, and Google, have changed the way that young consumers consume, and therefore purchase, technology. And that is a very dangerous position for a software company to be in, especially one that is not known for being nimble on its feet.
 
Facebook is perhaps the clearest example of this. While Mark Zuckerberg and others, brand Facebook a Social Utility, for young people, who really only care about functionality, Facebook succeeds because it is the killer web application for communications and personal information management. Facebook Mail is not without its problems, but the combination of Facebook Mail, Facebook Chat, and what is functionally an auto updating address book, makes Facebook into the new Outlook not only for those who are inside of Silicon Valley, but for anyone of the millions of people who use Facebook as either their sole or their primary digital identity. LinkedIn, is even more explicit than FaceBook is, in trying to become a person’s primary stop for vital, in this case professional, communications, as it is functionally a digital Rolodex.
 
Another example of Microsoft’s inability to understand younger users, comes in what I can only call their software design philosophy, which I can summarize as “Throw in More Features”. Yet, that seems antithetical to those products which are selling most successfully in the market place, especially to young people. Microsoft Office is the clearest example of this. The myriad number of options buried in Word 2008’s ribbons, will rarely be used by most users. And in Excel 2008, some users might need pivot tables, but vast majority of those that use spreadsheets will never ever need to use them, nor will they ever write a macro, or script in Visual Basic. What is clear from the success of Google Docs and Zoho, especially amongst college age students, is that people want tools that are simultaneously powerful and simple to use. And that is why not only are web based office replacements, which focus on ease of use,facilitating collaborative exchange, and being able to publish in digital environments, but also iWork and Star office, are gaining traction.
 
So, what is the take away from all of this? For Microsoft to pick up the proverbial ball and start running with it, it will need to listen to what the consumer wants, and design products that fit those needs, rather than assuming that the consumer will buy whatever it is that Microsoft hands them, just because it is a Microsoft product. And, the young consumers of today, the big spenders of tomorrow, want products that are focused on mobility, ease of use, speed, and simplicity. Perhaps what is most frustrating is that it is clear that it is not the hardware that is keeping Microsoft from building an Apple killer. There are great products that run the Windows platform. But young consumers, I believe, do not want just great hardware, but want a great computing experience, given how they create, disseminate, and consume information. Until Microsoft starts listening to young people and creating products and services that simply work, and that means no crashes, no blue screens, and a dead simple user interface, it will not surprise me that a melancholy mood will hang over Microsoft, and its share price.

   
Click here to download:
Microsofts_Real_Problem_Facebo.zip (113 KB)

Filed under  //   bad   ballmerian   failure   innovation   leadership   microsoft  

Comments [0]

Oh, Get Over It Mr. Ball**er ... :-(

Oh get over it Mr Ball***er .. What's all these "I'm a PC Gear" stuff really mean if what Microsoft deliver (during your reign) is a consistent stream of lame, boring, so-so, photo-copying, 'dinosauric' innovation and product ??
Real innovation work, real consistent groundbreaking design and product; that's what matter the most; not these "ad vs ad", "claim vs claim" on top of (your) recent lame products.
I am proud of Microsoft in the past. Bill Gates really needs to be back.

Filed under  //   ballmerian   change   leadership   microsoft   yuck  

Comments [0]

Wierd Stuff

Each time you visit http://microsoft.com, the site always ask for permission to install Silverlight, although each time I already politely click 'No Thanks'.
The next time you come, it will ask again. And again, and again, and again ... :-O
Would this 'disturbance' continue forever until I reach 75 years old? Wierd Ballm**rian stuff. Microsoft never behave like this in the past.

Filed under  //   microsoft   stuff   yuck  

Comments [0]

Where Does Microsoft Fit In ?

Perhaps 'now' is one of the most challenging era for Microsoft.

At the front-end (cool consumer device, mobile internet front-end, portable client computer, smart phone) they are facing Apple, at the back-end (search, cloud computing, internet ad business) they are facing Google.

How would Microsoft fit-in, into the groundbreaking computing trend of the future? Or are we start seeing the early sign of the 'possible birth' of the 'next dinosaur' ??

Some 'thinking slides' attached:

         
Click here to download:
Where_Does_Microsoft_Fits_In.zip (392 KB)

Quick draft narration to the slides:

  • Slide 1: There's change coming, and everybody have to relook their option.
  • Slide 2: Yet, dinosaurs (tend to) persist, they said the 'meteor' is not coming.
  • Slide 3: Microsoft might seriously need to change the world once more, if not they are doomed.
  • Slide 4: Apple is a great possible option.
  • Slide 5: Google + Apple is even a bigger, greater possible option, ever!

How would Microsoft fit in ... ? software + services? surface computing? silverlights? tablets?

(And how 'soon') ??

Filed under  //   apple   cloud computing   competition   google   innovation   internet   microsoft   relevance   strategy  

Comments [0]

'YUCK'-HOO ??

Would the inspiring YaHoo become a boring 'YuckHoo' once (one day) it is being swallowed by Microsoft ??
 
Remain to be seen.
 
I wonder how much more disaster Mr. Ball**r can do to the innovative world of computing?
 
The danger of a 'lauzy' leader who-happen-to-come-to-huge-massive-power-that-they-can-not-greatly-handle towards creation of greater cause that affect (and influence) society for the better.
 
-arv

Filed under  //   market   microsoft   trend   web   yuck  

Comments [0]

Micro-hoo??

Microsoft vs. Yahoo ?? (Round 3)
 
Micro-hoo -- part 3?
 
What would happen when people type www.yahoo.com, and the first page that appear is: "do you want to install silverlight" ?? :-O what would happen when people activate their YM, and the first message that appear is: "Are you a PC" ??
 
I seriously wonder what's so cool about Microsoft buying Yahoo, except that Carl Ichan now has his "money making objective" happen, and Mr Ballmer has his "apetite" to "eat Yahoo" (and later to have a chance to beat Google) fulfilled?
 
History shows that under Mr. Ball** leadership, the bigger Microsoft become, the slower it innovate in ways that changes society for the better.
 
Only when Microsoft had a leader that enable the company to innovate greatly once more, such acquisition matters. If not, perhaps it'd just be "monsterous distruction" to the great innovation potential of the world software industry. A step back to the world's global innovation potential, rather than a meaningful giant leap forward.
 
-arv

Filed under  //   competition   innovation   leadership   market   microsoft  

Comments [1]

Unfix-able Trouble At Microsoft ?!??

Nobody believes that Microsoft had an 'innovation' problem. I happened to say it since a few year back, most people (naturally) won't believe it, ... yet Microsoft indeed seem have a deep big innovation problem.
While Mr. Ball*** keep busy 'pooh pooh' ing the competitor at the outfront, the key fact remain: Microsoft innovation stalled, and no Ballmeristic bombastic 'statement' can hide that. Within the past few years Microsoft product become lame, it's innovation becomes lauzy.
 
Bill Gates might know that unless Microsoft react fast, the internet innovation and significant development might make Microsoft obsolete. Hence perhaps where the Ray Ozzie presence becomes important.
But the key question remain: could Ray Ozzie save the 'boat' ? He's no Bill Gates after all.
 
I sincerely still believe Bill Gates needs to be back.

Filed under  //   cloud computing   innovation   microsoft   next step  

Comments [1]

Silverlight Everywhere ??

One day, operating system would become irrelevant. It is integrated desktop+web front-end system and application platform mechanism that matters. -arv

Microsoft seems to start to understand that the computing paradigm has changed. No longer it is just about desktop system. Rather it's going to be about desktop and the web combined.

In response to that, they created a silverlight interface that esssentially:

  • Embrace desktop capability
  • Seamlessly integrate it with the web. 

Such hybrid front-end + cross-platform technology could dominate computing in the future. Microsoft can sense that. Hence they created Silverlight version that runs on Windows, as well as on Apple and any other (platform in the future).

Silverlight probably is among first of Microsoft technology that runs on many platforms, other than Windows. Adobe Air (the core technology that Microsoft imitate) shall be careful, and shall move faster as well, to maintain its pioneering effort and technical lead.

Filed under  //   cloud computing   force   innovation   leadership   market   marketing   microsoft   yuck  

Comments [0]

Slogan That Sounds Is Important!

People should always create 'slogan' that reflects the true most basic instinctive nature of their product, if not then the slogan will be just down!

Filed under  //   campaign   market   marketing   microsoft   slogan   yuck  

Comments [0]

How Would Microsoft Compete With Free?

Jean Louis Gassee ask that question.


We predict:

Microsoft would compete with 'free' by making Microsoft desktop software eventually free too (while at the same time: transforming the Office pricing model to become services subscription on the web), or -- alternatively -- they might be doing it 'half-half' through 'half-desktop-half-webservice' pricing proposition!.

Microsoft is buying time. OpenOffice (and OpenSource as a whole) probably just need to keep on
moving forward, and transform to become the creator and innovator of a new era!

Filed under  //   cloud computing   compete   competition   free   microsoft   open computing   trend  

Comments [0]